-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fiscal Year Multiselect #3151
Fiscal Year Multiselect #3151
Conversation
…same page - Updated search_indexes to allow mutliselect for fiscal period
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #3151 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 91.27% 91.61% +0.33%
===========================================
Files 291 291
Lines 8072 8075 +3
Branches 757 757
===========================================
+ Hits 7368 7398 +30
+ Misses 596 594 -2
+ Partials 108 83 -25
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
tdrs-backend/tdpservice/search_indexes/templates/multiselectdropdownfilter.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Outside of the circleci-workflow commenting, good to go!
@elipe17 i deployed this to qasp environment and am observing unexpected results when trying to apply any filter. I did clear the browser cache. see below: |
@ADPennington you might have to show me/tell me exactly what your are doing to generate that. I filtered based on your screen shot and everything seems to be working as expected (see below). Let me know how you'd like to proceed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM @elipe17 🚀
@lfrohlich @ttran-hub @klinkoberstar -- this PR enables the ability to export multiple fiscal periods of records to CSV, but it changes the steps for doing so. Please note:
⚠️ exporting more than 100K records at a time is still not feasible from DAC, so selecting multiple fiscal periods of records to export will reinforce this limitation. We have a few other tickets that explore solutions to the exporting issue (e.g. [bug] OFA unable to export data to csv by record type and fiscal period #3137, Spike - Streamlined access to recent data #3176)- In order export data (from DAC) by fiscal period now, the following steps are required:
- Select the fiscal year(s)
- Click
filter by year
- Select the fiscal quarter(s)
- Click
filter by quarter
- If needed, make any additional filter selections before clicking
Apply Filters
. - ℹ️ A video of these steps are saved in our Teams Channel here 🔐 .
Summary of Changes
year
and one for thequarter
since it was impossible to keep it at a single filter with our current multi select filter capabilities.Pull request closes Admin Exp: Django Implement Multi-Select Fiscal Period Dropdown For Data Export #3102
How to Test
Deliverables
More details on how deliverables herein are assessed included here.
Deliverable 1: Accepted Features
Checklist of ACs:
Deliverable 2: Tested Code
CodeCov Report
comment in PR)CodeCov Report
comment in PR)Deliverable 3: Properly Styled Code
Deliverable 4: Accessible
iamjolly
andttran-hub
using Accessibility Insights reveal any errors introduced in this PR?Deliverable 5: Deployed
Deliverable 6: Documented
Deliverable 7: Secure
Deliverable 8: User Research
Research product(s) clearly articulate(s):